5317 Publication Rough Draft

Technology as Invisible Learning:

Introduction

Too often, when technology enters the classroom, it becomes the star of the show. Teachers ask, “What app should I use?” or “Which tool fits this lesson?” But technology should never overshadow the real work of learning. When integrated effectively, it fades into the background, acting as a catalyst for engagement and deeper understanding. As an instructional leader, I have learned that successful technology integration is not about the shiniest platform but about aligning tools to meaningful learning experiences.

Grounding in Thought Leaders

This perspective is not new. Dewey argued that learning is active and social, rooted in authentic experience. Vygotsky emphasized scaffolding and interaction, while Bruner and Piaget focused on building conceptual understanding. Papert advanced the idea that technology supports constructivist learning when it encourages exploration and creation.

More recently, Roger Schank (2011) has argued that cognitive science must shape how we design learning. He suggests that invisible learning—where students concentrate on problem-solving, prediction, and application—creates durable memory and deeper understanding. His work connects directly to modeling and evaluation: students learn best when they see authentic examples, test ideas, and reflect on results.

Example from Practice: “Beyond Procedures” Professional Learning

A recent professional learning experience I designed, Beyond Procedures: Building Conceptual Understanding in Secondary School Math, illustrates this philosophy. Too often, math instruction reduces students to rule-followers, applying steps without understanding the why. My goal was to model an approach where teachers experienced math conceptually first, then connected digital tools as supports rather than as the focus.

In one session, we used interactive whiteboards and digital manipulatives to explore proportional reasoning. Teachers predicted outcomes, tested reasoning, and compared models across platforms. Technology enhanced collaboration and visualization, but the learning itself—the deep conceptual discussions and teacher reflection—took center stage.

What worked well was modeling: teachers could see me demonstrate an approach, then immediately apply and evaluate it. What didn’t work as well were time constraints and over-reliance on a single tool. This reminded me that no technology guarantees learning; it is the instructional process that matters most.

Impact on Practice and Leadership

Looking ahead to leadership, this philosophy will continue shaping my vision and coaching. Whether supporting CTE instructors using NCCER modules or guiding math teachers toward conceptual practice, I want colleagues to view technology as a hidden support system—not the centerpiece of a lesson.

My role is to help teachers plan lessons around cognitive processes such as prediction, modeling, and evaluation, so students develop durable understanding. This reflects Schank’s call for invisible learning and Dewey’s insistence that education connect to authentic experience. In my own context, it means ensuring that digital tools serve the learner first. Technology is not a hammer looking for nails—it is a framework for creativity, problem-solving, and reflection.

Conclusion

Technology in education is not about flashy apps or compliance checklists. It is about fostering authentic learning where digital tools fade into the background. My professional learning work reinforced that modeling and evaluation are central to this process. By focusing on these cognitive practices, I can help shift classrooms from tool-centered to learner-centered spaces.

As educators, we must keep our eyes on the true north of learning: building meaningful connections, empowering students, and helping teachers view technology not as just another tool in the box, but as part of the environment that makes deep learning possible.

Potential Publication Outlets

Edutopia – practical, classroom-focused articles for teachers.
Educational Leadership (ASCD) – leadership-focused audience.
TechTrends (AECT) – scholarly but practice-oriented.

*PEER FEEDBACK/REFLECTION BELOW*